One of the largest data-center campuses ever proposed in the United States, a $24.7B plan, undone not by power or economics but by a defect in how the county advertised its own vote.
Updated 2026-08-14 · maintained as new filings and rulings land
Location
Prince William County, VA
Developers
QTS + Compass Datacenters
Scale
2,100+ ac · 37 DCs · 23M sf
Value (county est.)
$24.7B · $400.5M/yr tax
Approval
4-3-1 board vote · Dec 2023
Status
Dead · Jul 2, 2026
Before the autopsy
A $24.7B campus, one of the largest ever proposed. Best guess: what actually killed it?
The setup
The PW Digital Gateway sat along Pageland Lane in Prince William County, on the western edge of Northern Virginia's "Data Center Alley," the densest data-center market on earth. Developers QTS (owned by Blackstone) and Compass Datacenters proposed rezoning roughly 2,100 acres to allow up to 37 data centers and about 23 million square feet of construction over roughly a decade. County finance staff pegged the potential investment at $24.7 billion and annual tax revenue at $400.5 million.
It was also one of the most contested land-use fights in the state. The site bordered the Manassas National Battlefield Park, and opposition fused three usually separate constituencies: neighbors worried about noise and transmission lines, conservation groups, and historic-preservation advocates. That coalition was organized, well funded, and, critically, prepared to litigate.
Timeline
Dec 2023After a marathon public hearing that ran roughly 29 hours, the Board of Supervisors approves the rezoning on a 4-3-1 vote. Chair Ann Wheeler and three Democratic supervisors vote yes; one Democrat abstains; the three Republicans vote no.
Early 2024Opponents file suit. The challenge targets not the merits of the project but whether the county followed Virginia's public-notice rules when it advertised and adopted the rezoning.
2025Trial in Prince William Circuit Court before Judge Kimberly Irving. Public-notice compliance is the central issue.
Aug 2025Judge Irving voids the rezonings. The county published required newspaper notices at the wrong intervals, failed to make the proposed ordinances available for public inspection, and held the hearing too soon after the final notice.
Mar 31, 2026The Court of Appeals of Virginia affirms the ruling.
Jul 2, 2026After the county board and Compass withdraw their appeals, QTS withdraws its final appeal. The project is officially over.
Cause of death, in detail
Virginia law requires local governments to follow strict procedures before adopting a zoning ordinance: advertise the public hearing in a newspaper at prescribed intervals, make the proposed ordinance available for public inspection, and time the hearing correctly relative to the final notice. These are not formalities. A rezoning adopted without proper notice is void, regardless of how sound the underlying project is.
That is exactly what happened. Opponents did not have to win a debate about data centers, water, or transmission. They only had to prove the county cut a procedural corner, and they did. The approval that took years and a 29-hour hearing to secure collapsed on the paperwork that authorized it. Everything downstream, billions in planned investment and years of entitlement work, rested on that single point of failure.
The four fatal mistakes
Built the whole campus on a cracked legal foundation. A $24.7B program rested entirely on one rezoning whose notice compliance was never independently stress-tested. One litigable flaw was enough to void it. Entitlement risk was treated as settled once the vote passed; it was not.
Maximized opposition intensity, then handed them a record. Forcing a mega-approval through a 29-hour hostile hearing did not just generate political heat; it produced a motivated, litigation-capable opposition and the detailed public record they later used in court.
Left no off-ramp. One all-or-nothing rezoning across 2,100+ acres meant there was no phased or scaled-down fallback that could survive if the main approval failed. When it broke, the entire project broke with it.
Misread the opponent. This was a disciplined legal campaign, not NIMBY noise. The developers arrived with a construction and financing plan and met an adversary fighting on procedure and process.
Signals that were public beforehand
A 4-3-1 approval with an abstention: a fragile, one-vote mandate, not a durable consensus. Margin of victory is a risk signal.
A 29-hour hearing and an organized coalition that filed suit almost immediately after the vote.
The notice-compliance record itself, a public procedural checklist any competent land-use counsel could have audited before a dollar of construction capital was committed.
Aftermath
With the rezoning voided and appeals exhausted, the land reverted to its prior, largely rural zoning. The case is now cited across the industry as proof that entitlement and procedural risk, not just power and land, can kill a mega-campus, and that a well-organized community can win in a courtroom what it might lose at the ballot box.
The insight to carry away
The government's procedure is your risk. You do not control whether a county advertises its hearing correctly, but you inherit the consequence if it does not. Audit notice and process compliance before you commit capital.
A narrow approval invites litigation. A 4-3-1 vote is a flashing light. Treat thin margins as a signal to harden the legal foundation and buy political durability, not as a win to bank.
All-or-nothing entitlements have a single point of failure. Phasing, severability, and legal redundancy turn one fatal flaw into a survivable setback.
Opposition that can litigate changes the game. When the fight moves from policy to procedure, the winning move is a pre-mortem, not a better slide deck.
Take it to your IC
We keep a board-ready one-pager of this autopsy: the timeline, the deal-level detail, and every source, formatted to drop straight into an investment-committee memo. Want it sent over?
On its way. Check your inbox.
Updates
2026-08-14 Autopsy published: full timeline, cause of death, four failure modes, and sources.
This file is maintained. As new filings, rulings, or deal detail surface, they get logged here.